Categories: Views

“AI systems are only as objective as the data that feeds them.”

The View Magazine opinion piece by Verity Butler.

As AI quietly enters the justice system, urgent questions are arising over fairness, transparency, and control.

In recent months, the stealthy adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) within the UK’s criminal justice system has begun to attract sharper public scrutiny. Reports have revealed that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is experimenting with machine learning tools to assist with areas such as probation decisions, predictive policing, and prison management. These developments, while often couched in the language of efficiency and innovation, have provoked alarm among rights groups and researchers who warn that the risks of bias, discrimination, and opaque decision-making may far outweigh the promised gains.

In September, it was also reported that the MoJ was piloting AI models aimed at identifying prisoners at risk of reoffending or self-harm. Similar systems, trialled elsewhere in Europe, have been criticised for embedding racial and socioeconomic prejudices into the data they rely on. When historical criminal records are used to “train” algorithms, the outputs inevitably mirror the inequalities of the past. The result is what some campaigners have called “automated injustice”, an invisible but deeply consequential shift in how human freedom is assessed and controlled.

What worries many observers is the lack of transparency. The MoJ has so far refused to publish detailed information about which systems are in use, who built them, or how they are tested for bias. Without that transparency, public trust and justice itself hangs in the balance.

To better understand how these concerns are unfolding internationally, The View reached out to the Council on Criminal Justice, a US-based think tank that has established a dedicated Task Force on Artificial Intelligence. The Council’s director of that task force, Jesse Rothman, has been leading an effort to bring together experts from across disciplines to confront the challenges and possibilities of AI in law.

Read Verity Butler’s full article on The View 15 here: The View Magazine Issue 15 Autumn 2025 Digital Edition – The View – for women with conviction

Opinion article by The View.

The View Magazine

Recent Posts

Lucy Letby Case Referred to the CCRC

The case of Lucy Letby, the former neonatal nurse convicted in one of the most…

5 hours ago

When Will the Judiciary Confront Violence Against Women?

The murder of Lucy Ann Rushton in Andover in June 2019 was a brutal reminder…

1 day ago

Trump Administration Expands Mexico City Policy to Prohibit DEI and “Gender Ideology”

The Trump administration has announced a historical expansion of the scope of the “Global Gag…

5 days ago

Fresh air and mental health

By Camila CrockerWith the rise of global warming, urbanisation and the modern office job, countless…

7 days ago

Court of Appeal Fails Justice: Farah Damji’s Case Exposes Systemic Corruption

The Court of Appeal’s refusal to consider medical and mental health and fresh evidence including…

2 weeks ago

From the Blue Stockings to Salles Connes: The Journey of French Feminism and The Organisations Fighting For Equality Today

France prides itself on égalité, liberté, fraternité, yet more than two centuries after the Revolution,…

2 weeks ago

This website uses cookies.