Categories: Views

“AI systems are only as objective as the data that feeds them.”

The View Magazine opinion piece by Verity Butler.

As AI quietly enters the justice system, urgent questions are arising over fairness, transparency, and control.

In recent months, the stealthy adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) within the UK’s criminal justice system has begun to attract sharper public scrutiny. Reports have revealed that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is experimenting with machine learning tools to assist with areas such as probation decisions, predictive policing, and prison management. These developments, while often couched in the language of efficiency and innovation, have provoked alarm among rights groups and researchers who warn that the risks of bias, discrimination, and opaque decision-making may far outweigh the promised gains.

In September, it was also reported that the MoJ was piloting AI models aimed at identifying prisoners at risk of reoffending or self-harm. Similar systems, trialled elsewhere in Europe, have been criticised for embedding racial and socioeconomic prejudices into the data they rely on. When historical criminal records are used to “train” algorithms, the outputs inevitably mirror the inequalities of the past. The result is what some campaigners have called “automated injustice”, an invisible but deeply consequential shift in how human freedom is assessed and controlled.

What worries many observers is the lack of transparency. The MoJ has so far refused to publish detailed information about which systems are in use, who built them, or how they are tested for bias. Without that transparency, public trust and justice itself hangs in the balance.

To better understand how these concerns are unfolding internationally, The View reached out to the Council on Criminal Justice, a US-based think tank that has established a dedicated Task Force on Artificial Intelligence. The Council’s director of that task force, Jesse Rothman, has been leading an effort to bring together experts from across disciplines to confront the challenges and possibilities of AI in law.

Read Verity Butler’s full article on The View 15 here: The View Magazine Issue 15 Autumn 2025 Digital Edition – The View – for women with conviction

Opinion article by The View.

The View Magazine

Recent Posts

Why The Pink Pill Matters

At a moment when women’s health and bodily autonomy are under assault in law and…

23 hours ago

The True Cost of Irresponsible Journalism: Why Media Accountability Matters More Than Ever

The recent findings from the Press Recognition Panel’s (PRP) 10th Annual Report confirm what many…

2 days ago

URGENT & IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED: Imminent Threat to Life, FireSafety Failures, and Toxic Exposure at HMP Eastwood Park

SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE, UK — February 20, 2026 — The Feminist Justice Coalition (FJC) has today issued…

2 weeks ago

Female artists speak out following release of Epstein-related documents

A renewed wave of scrutiny has emerged across the entertainment industry following the release of…

3 weeks ago

Women in Prison With Cancer Are Missing From the New 10‑Year Cancer Plan — Again

The government has finally released its long‑awaited 10‑year cancer plan, a document that promises to…

1 month ago

Hannah More: Bristol’s Abolitionist Voice Against Slavery

Hannah More (1745–1833) was one of the most influential abolitionists and reformers of her time,…

1 month ago

This website uses cookies.